2) Authorship Criteria: All signed authors must meet the journal's authorship criteria, that is, all authors must have materially participated in the research and/or article preparation. They should have made substantial contributions to the following: conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, etc.
3) Author Contribution & Conflict of Interest Statement: All authors need to fill in and submit the journal's “Author Statement Form”, to confirm that all authors have made substantial contributions to the article and there is no nominal author, and to disclose all potential conflicts of interest involved in the research. A conflict of interest may exist when an author (or the author’s institution or employer) has financial or personal relationships or affiliations that could influence (or bias) the author’s decisions, work, or manuscript. Authors should also disclose conflicts of interest with products that compete with those mentioned in their manuscript.
4) The author list shall not be modified at will. If authors intend to change the order of authorship, add or delete authors, a formal letter signed by all authors of initial submission and a copy of the first author's ID card should be provided to the Editorial Department. If an author's institution needs to be changed, an official letter with the seal of the original institution shall be provided to the Editorial Department.
2. Duty of Editors
1) Editors should deal with each manuscript fairly and impartially, and accept or reject a manuscript according to the journal's scope, the novelty and academic quality of the manuscript.
2) Editors should strictly follow the single-blind review process of the journal and keep the true review records. They have the duty to keep confidential the information of authors and reviewers, the authors' research results, and the intermediate materials in manuscript processing.
3) Editors have the responsibility to avoid academic misconduct such as multiple submissions and redundant publication. Editors should conduct plagiarism checking on all manuscripts.
4) Editors should provide authors with detailed revision opinions or reasons for rejection as much as possible, objectively state the review status of manuscripts, and do not make personal comments or attacks on review experts and authors.
5) In the process of editing and publishing, editors should not only pay attention to publishing standards, but also respect author's point of view and writing style, and should obtain author's consent for key revisions of a manuscript, such as revision to academic views.
3. Duty of Reviewers
1) Reviewers should make honest, objective, and fair review based on the principles of maintaining academic integrity and respecting academic freedom; they shall not prejudice or discriminate against author's country, institution, race, religion, political belief, gender, etc., and shall not disclose the research content of manuscripts that they review.
2) When there are conflicts of interest between reviewer and author (e.g., kinship, teacher-student relationship, alumni relationship, colleague relationship, competition relationship), in order to ensure the fairness of the review, the reviewer should consult the Editorial Department in time to obtain further suggestions.
3) When a reviewer finds the research is similar to his/her own, the review comments must not contain unsubstantiated or malicious criticism and unfair content. The reviewer should avoid making unfounded allegations.
4) Reviewers should review manuscripts in a timely manner as agreed. If reviews cannot be returned on time, the reviewer should notify the Editorial Department in time and withdraw from reviewing the manuscript, and can recommend suitable reviewers. Without the permission of the Editorial Department, reviewers are not allowed to entrust their own students or colleagues to review the manuscripts on their own behalf.
5) When reviewers encounter a manuscript, they have reviewed, they are obliged to report the situation to the Editorial Department and complete the review according to the journal’s standards.
4. Academic Misconduct
Construction Technology only accepts original articles that have not been published. Academic misconduct such as plagiarism, data forgery, multiple submissions, and redundant publication are strictly prohibited!
In order to prevent academic misconduct, the Editorial Department adopts the AMLC System provided by China national knowledge infrastructure (CNKI) to check the manuscripts during the preliminary review stage and before their publication.
If the duplicate check rate of a manuscript exceeds the standard (20% for articles in regular issues,and 30% for articles in supplementary issues), the manuscript will be rejected. If the journal is adversely affected by author's academic misconduct, such as multiple contributions, the Editorial Department will notify the author's affiliated institution and make public statement in terms of relevant issue in the journal; at the same time, the author must bear the costs of manuscript review, editing and processing, papers and printing, and apologize publicly to the journal.
5. Appeal and Post-publication Discussion
1) The journal allows authors to appeal. If authors have any disagreement to the review comments or review results, they could submit a written appeal to the Editorial Department by sending it to the journal’s email (sgjs@cadg.cn). The author who submits the appeal needs to make detailed explanation for each review comment. After receiving the appeal, the Editorial Department will investigate and deal with it as soon as possible, and the result of the appeal will be fed back to the author.
2) We welcome authors and readers to make discussion on the journal’s published articles. Comments can be sent to the journal’s email (sgjs@cadg.cn). The Editorial Department will deal with it as soon as possible and give feedback as appropriate. We welcome readers and authors to actively provide their comments on the articles to the journal, which can help us to create a positive academic atmosphere.
6. Retraction and Correction
1) For manuscript accepted by the journal, the authors shall not arbitrarily request to withdraw or modify the manuscript after it is finalized. All authors are deemed to agree to this statement when they submit to the journal.
2) Correction: If it appears that there are honest scientific errors in published article, which would not lead to significant impacts on the results and conclusions of the article, the Editorial Department will publish corrections in the journal as soon as possible, detailing the changes made to the original article and indicating the source of the article. The Editorial Department will release the corrected new version of the article, and specify the changes to the original article and the date of the update. Only the latest version of the article should be used for citation.
3) Retraction: If a published article is confirmed to involve plagiarized research results, falsified data, redundant publication, or other academic misconduct, the Editorial Department will retract the article, including publishing a retraction statement publicly, and requiring relevant databases to delete all online versions of the article so that the adverse effects of the misleading article could be minimized.
7. Digital Archive & Online Accessibility
Articles published by the journal since 2022 have been digitally archived on the journal’s official website, through which readers can directly access the articles online. All information and material are backed-up in the Editorial Department for security reason, including the print-copy and digital-copy of all issues, and all other relevant material (e.g., authors’ additional information and forms submitted during submission).
In addition to archiving on our official website, the full-text of the journal’s articles are also stored in the databases of CNKI and Wanfang Data. Readers can access the above-mentioned databases to obtain the articles published by the journal.
It is allowed for authors to deposit all versions of their articles in an institutional or other repository of the authors’ choice. However, it is necessary to indicate the articles’ publishing information in the metadata in the institutional or other repository and use that as a recommended way of citation.